|
|
|
|
Economic Development and Semi-Democracies: The Relationship between Economic Development and Political Regimes in Malaysia and Singapore, 1960-2004 |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
While whether economic development determines transition to democracy has been studied and retested several times, the relationship of economic development and semi-democracies has been understudied. Does economic development and semi-democracies have any relationship? Why have they not been fully democratized while their economies have performed well? This paper studies whether economic development has an impact on semi-democracies in terms of whether economic development has a significant impact on semi-democratic regimes and how semi-democracies are related to economic development. It hopes to find the answer of whether economic development can lead to transition to full democracies in semi-democratic regimes. To examine whether there is a significant relationship between economic development and semi-democracies, it uses the economic development and political regimes of Malaysia and Singapore as the case study. The finding is that economic development does not have significant impact on semi-democracies and there seems to be no significant between economic development and semi-democratic regimes. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
regim (157), econom (148), polit (132), develop (114), democraci (112), democrat (96), singapor (79), malaysia (75), semi (67), politi (49), countri (46), whether (42), capita (41), per (41), incom (40), transit (36), impact (36), like (35), p (33), signific (33), variabl (32), |
Author's Keywords:
|
economic development, semi-democracy, GDP, Income per capita, Malaysia, Singapore |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention makes running your annual conference simple and cost effective. It is your online solution for abstract management, peer review, and scheduling for your annual meeting or convention. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: MPSA Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Laiprakobsup, Thanapan. "Economic Development and Semi-Democracies: The Relationship between Economic Development and Political Regimes in Malaysia and Singapore, 1960-2004" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 03, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p267376_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Laiprakobsup, T. , 2008-04-03 "Economic Development and Semi-Democracies: The Relationship between Economic Development and Political Regimes in Malaysia and Singapore, 1960-2004" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p267376_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: While whether economic development determines transition to democracy has been studied and retested several times, the relationship of economic development and semi-democracies has been understudied. Does economic development and semi-democracies have any relationship? Why have they not been fully democratized while their economies have performed well? This paper studies whether economic development has an impact on semi-democracies in terms of whether economic development has a significant impact on semi-democratic regimes and how semi-democracies are related to economic development. It hopes to find the answer of whether economic development can lead to transition to full democracies in semi-democratic regimes. To examine whether there is a significant relationship between economic development and semi-democracies, it uses the economic development and political regimes of Malaysia and Singapore as the case study. The finding is that economic development does not have significant impact on semi-democracies and there seems to be no significant between economic development and semi-democratic regimes. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
31 |
| Word count: |
7454 |
| Text sample: |
| 1 Economic Development and SemiDemocracies: The Relationship between Economic Development and Political Regimes in Malaysia and Singapore 19602004 Thanapan Laiprakobsup University of Houston Abstract While whether economic development determines transition to democracy has been studied and retested several times the relationship of economic development and semi- democracies has been understudied. Does economic development and semi-democracies have any relationship? Why have they not been fully democratized while their economies have performed well? This paper studies whether economic development has an impact on semi- democracies in terms of whether economic development has a significant impact on semi- |
| Arturo. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Ed. Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. 27. World Bank. 2007. World Development Indicators. Washington DC: World Bank 28. World Bank. 2007. World Development Indicators: CD-ROM. Washington DC: World Bank. Electronic Reference 1. Freedom House. 2007. Country Report: Malaysia. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=22&year=2007&country=7223. Assessed on various days. 2. Freedom House. 2007. Country Report: Singapore. http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=363&year=2007&country=7269. Assessed on various days. 3. Marshall Monty G. Keith Jaggers and Ted Robert Gurr. Polity |
Similar Titles:
The Impact of Private Sector Development on Democratization in Developing Countries: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis on Democracy and Capitalism
The Chinese Transition: a Unique Transitional Route towards Economic Development and Political Democracy
|
|