|
|
|
|
Testing Three Dimensions of Social Identity Among Republicans and Democrats |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP!
You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
I test a three-factor model of Social Identity to (a) examine its fit in party identification, (b) test for differences between Republcians and Democrats, and (c) compare the explanatory power of Ingroup Affect, Ingroup Ties, and Centrality. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
ident (174), social (113), ingroup (89), parti (89), partisan (87), group (74), republican (70), affect (66), democrat (64), polit (60), cognit (55), scale (50), dimens (49), attitud (46), measur (44), question (43), one (43), independ (40), identif (40), vote (39), three (38), |
Author's Keywords:
|
party identity, social identity, dimensionality, social identity theory |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: MPSA Annual National Conference
URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Neely, Francis. "Testing Three Dimensions of Social Identity Among Republicans and Democrats" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 03, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p268368_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Neely, F. , 2008-04-03 "Testing Three Dimensions of Social Identity Among Republicans and Democrats" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the MPSA Annual National Conference, Palmer House Hotel, Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p268368_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: I test a three-factor model of Social Identity to (a) examine its fit in party identification, (b) test for differences between Republcians and Democrats, and (c) compare the explanatory power of Ingroup Affect, Ingroup Ties, and Centrality. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
26 |
| Word count: |
9261 |
| Text sample: |
| Testing Three Dimensions of Social Identity among Republicans and Democrats Francis Neely Department of Political Science San Francisco State University fneely@sfsu.edu This research was supported by the California State University’s Social Science Research and Instructional Council and the Field Research Corporation. Thanks to Ed Nelson and the Council and Mark DiCamillo at Field. Paper prepared for presentation at the 66th Annual National Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association April 3 – 6 2008 Chicago 1 Abstract I test |
| In general being a(n) (ingroup member) is an important part of my self-image. The fact that I am a(n) (ingroup member) rarely enters my mind. (Ingroup Affect) In general I’m glad to be a(n) (ingroup member). I often regret that I am a(n) (ingroup member). I don’t feel good about being a(n) (ingroup member). Generally I feel good when I think about myself as a(n) (ingroup member). (Ingroup Ties) I have a lot in common with other (ingroup members). |
Similar Titles:
How Republicans and Democrats Think and Feel: Contrasting Group Identities and Their Impact on Partisan Attitudes and Behavior
Identity Fluidity in the Voting Booth: Social Group Identification and Latino Vote Choice
|
|
