Convention All Academic Convention is the premier solution for your association's abstract management solutions needs. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: ASC Annual Meeting URL: http://www.asc41.com
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p270890_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Fukushima, Miyuki., Spivak, Andrew. and Kelley, Margaret. "Gender Differences in Perceived Threats of Formal and Informal Sanctions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ASC Annual Meeting, St. Louis Adam's Mark, St. Louis, Missouri, Nov 11, 2008 <Not Available>. 2010-01-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p270890_index.html>

Fukushima, M. , Spivak, A. and Kelley, M. , 2008-11-11 "Gender Differences in Perceived Threats of Formal and Informal Sanctions" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ASC Annual Meeting, St. Louis Adam's Mark, St. Louis, Missouri Online <PDF>. 2010-01-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p270890_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Using self-reported data on perceived formal and informal deterrence against the alcohol policy violation and intention to break the policy among college students, we examine the extent to which deterrence theory accounts for two important issues raised by feminist scholars. (1) Can deterrence theory account for the expected gender gap in intention to offend? (2) Can deterrence theory explain female rule breaking equally as well as male rule breaking? We found strong support for deterrence theory in terms of the first issue; however, informal deterrence was more important in explaining the relationship between gender and projected rule breaking than formal deterrence. Moreover, though there was no gender difference in the effect of formal deterrence on projected rule breaking, contrary to our expectation, the effect of embarrassment on rule breaking was significantly stronger for males than for females.

Religion and the Deterrent Effects of an Alcohol Ban on Drinking among College Students

Gender and Candidate Quality: How do College Students View Male & Female State Legislators as Candidates for Congressional Office?