Convention Submission, Review, and Scheduling! All Academic Convention can help with all of your abstract management needs and many more. Contact us today for a quote! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: APSA 2008 Annual Meeting URL: http://www.apsanet.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p278253_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Rosenberg, Shawn. and Wrigley, Ted. "Thinking about Chemistry, Social Identity and Political Tolerance: A Multi-Method Study of Individual Differences in Political Cognition" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2008 <Not Available>. 2009-05-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p278253_index.html>

Rosenberg, S. W. and Wrigley, T. , 2008-08-28 "Thinking about Chemistry, Social Identity and Political Tolerance: A Multi-Method Study of Individual Differences in Political Cognition" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <PDF>. 2009-05-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p278253_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: We explore the different ways in which people make sense of and identify with social and political groups. In so doing, we draw on a structural pragmatic view of political thinking. This view suggests that a person’s political thinking is structured. Drawing on this claim, we explore the hypothesis that although a person may know more about some matters and less about others, the various understanding he or she constructs will share common formal characteristics. Structural pragmatic theory also suggests that the structural qualities of political thinking may vary from one individual to the next. Following this, we explore the hypothesis that individuals may think in structurally different ways and therefore that different people may understand the same event in qualitatively different ways. Unlike earlier research on these questions, we adopt an approach which bridges the interpretive concerns and empirical methods of structural pragmatics with those which are more commonly adopted in political science studies of public opinion. Thus we use an open-ended problem solving task, a chemistry experiment, to assess the quality of the subjects thinking. We then draw on this to predict how subjects will perform on close-ended survey measures of their social identification with ingroups and their evaluation and political tolerance of outgroups. The results provide general support for hypothees of an underlying structure of thought and individual differences. They also suggest the potenital of empirical research which combines qualitative and quantitative measures of cognition.

Social Capital and Political Participation in America: An Individual or Group Level Relationship?

The Different Ways We Think about Politics: _x000d_A Multi-Method Study of Individual Differences in Political Cognition

Understanding the left-right political divide in explanations for social problems: Stable individual difference or motivated reasoning?