|
|
|
|
Social Divisions, Political Sophistication, and Political Equality in Comparative Perspective |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
Although there are various conceptualizations of political sophistication and political knowledge extant in the literature, almost all of the indicators of these concepts show clear correlations with education. Further, education usually correlates with social stratification. Thus, the political presentation of the socially and/or economically disadvantaged may be hampered to the degree that political knowledge and political sophistication distorts political choices and attitudes. On the other hand, the political heuristics literature has often stressed the role of the political environment for making heuristics useful or available at all. For this reason, the same gradient in political knowledge and political sophistication in a democracy's population need not always lead to the same discrepancy in the quality of political representation of different social classes.
This paper explores the connection between social inequality, political sophistication and knowledge, and political attitudes in a comparative perspective. It those aspects of social and political systems that facilitate the use of political cues---how party organizations, the structure of party competition, the the degree of organization of the population by trades unions, and the structure of the educational system can help alleviating the averse effects of knowledge deficiencies of certain parts of the population and thus promote political equality. The empirical analyses of the paper show that the system of government and individual trade union membership impinge on the level and the evenness of the distribution of practical aspects of political sophistication, namely of naming political issues, locating parties political positions, and knowing more or less basic political facts. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
polit (195), system (93), model (59), educ (58), parti (50), union (47), effect (46), knowledg (40), govern (39), inform (36), may (32), choic (31), sophist (29), opinion (29), parliamentari (28), elect (27), 2002 (27), abil (25), posit (25), use (25), cient (24), |
Author's Keywords:
|
political equality, political sophistication, cross-national comparison |
|
 | Convention | | Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: APSA 2008 Annual Meeting URL: http://www.apsanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Elff, Martin. "Social Divisions, Political Sophistication, and Political Equality in Comparative Perspective" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2008 <Not Available>. 2010-06-06 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p280020_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Elff, M. , 2008-08-28 "Social Divisions, Political Sophistication, and Political Equality in Comparative Perspective" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the APSA 2008 Annual Meeting, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2010-06-06 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p280020_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Although there are various conceptualizations of political sophistication and political knowledge extant in the literature, almost all of the indicators of these concepts show clear correlations with education. Further, education usually correlates with social stratification. Thus, the political presentation of the socially and/or economically disadvantaged may be hampered to the degree that political knowledge and political sophistication distorts political choices and attitudes. On the other hand, the political heuristics literature has often stressed the role of the political environment for making heuristics useful or available at all. For this reason, the same gradient in political knowledge and political sophistication in a democracy's population need not always lead to the same discrepancy in the quality of political representation of different social classes.
This paper explores the connection between social inequality, political sophistication and knowledge, and political attitudes in a comparative perspective. It those aspects of social and political systems that facilitate the use of political cues---how party organizations, the structure of party competition, the the degree of organization of the population by trades unions, and the structure of the educational system can help alleviating the averse effects of knowledge deficiencies of certain parts of the population and thus promote political equality. The empirical analyses of the paper show that the system of government and individual trade union membership impinge on the level and the evenness of the distribution of practical aspects of political sophistication, namely of naming political issues, locating parties political positions, and knowing more or less basic political facts. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
25 |
| Word count: |
8224 |
| Text sample: |
| Social Divisions Political Sophistication and Political Equality in Comparative Perspective Martin Elff University of Mannheim Building A5 6 Room 328 68131 Mannheim Germany elff@sowi.uni-mannheim.de Prepared for delivery at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association August 28-31 2008. Abstract Although there are various conceptualizations of political sophistication and political knowledge extant in the literature almost all of the indicators of these concepts show clear correlations with education. Further education usually correlates with social stratification. Thus the |
| 3 as denominator) based on data of Module 2 of CSES. ∗ ∗ ∗ = p < 0.001 ∗∗ = p < 0.01 ∗ = p < 0.05. The CSES contributing election studies used for estimation are Australia (2004) Belgium (2003) Canada (2004) Finland (2003) France (2002) Germany (2002 telephone) Ireland (2002) Israel (2003) Italy (2006) Japan (2004) Netherlands (2002) New Zealand (2002) Norway (2001) Portugal (2002) Portugal (2005) Spain (2004) Sweden (2002) Switzerland (2003) Great Britain (2005) United |
Similar Titles:
The Effects of Political Knowledge on the Ability to Spot Manipulated Information in Print News Coverage of the 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Election
The Impact of Political Ideology and Government Structure on Information Technology Policy: A Comparison of Technologically Sophisticated Countries with Differing Types of Governments
Representation and the Colombia's 'New Parties: The Effects of Political Reform on Colombia's Party System
Primary Elections in Two-Party Systems: The Effects of Party Nominations on Policy Outcomes
Position Change in Major Parties: The Dynamic Relationship between Party Choices and Public Opinion
|
|