|
|
|
|
“Explaining the Occurrence and Outcome of Coups d’état” |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
The coup d’ état is a phenomenon that has long been studied by scholars, but little consensus has arisen regarding which factors lead elites to overthrow the incumbent. I argue these inconsistencies are due to two shortcomings. First, variables related to the military are largely absent from previous analyses, despite the vast majority of coups being undertaken by the armed forces. Second, most studies have either relied solely on successful coups or have aggregated failed and successful attempts as one category. In the former case, the data only allows us to draw conclusions regarding when a successful coup will occur. In the case of the latter, we can make inferences regarding when elites will make the decision to attempt a coup, but we cannot draw conclusions regarding which factors determine whether or not the attempt will succeed. While some factors may explain when a coup is more likely to be attempted, those factors may be inadequate in explaining whether or not the attempt will succeed. I argue that while socio-economic, political, and military factors can impact the decision to intervene, success will largely be determined by factors related to the military. In order to properly assess both aspects of coup activity, the theory is tested with a selection model incorporating global coup data from 1960-2007. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
coup (255), militari (167), attempt (154), regim (64), success (62), like (49), impact (46), soldier (46), outcom (45), variabl (39), model (38), qualiti (37), polit (37), personnel (33), studi (33), fail (32), factor (31), year (30), econom (28), 1 (27), number (26), |
|
 | Convention | | All Academic Convention can solve the abstract management needs for any association's annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Southern Political Science Association URL: http://www.spsa.net
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Powell, Jonathan. "“Explaining the Occurrence and Outcome of Coups d’état”" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA, Jan 07, 2009 <Not Available>. 2010-01-23 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p282993_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Powell, J. M. , 2009-01-07 "“Explaining the Occurrence and Outcome of Coups d’état”" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Hotel Intercontinental, New Orleans, LA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2010-01-23 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p282993_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: The coup d’ état is a phenomenon that has long been studied by scholars, but little consensus has arisen regarding which factors lead elites to overthrow the incumbent. I argue these inconsistencies are due to two shortcomings. First, variables related to the military are largely absent from previous analyses, despite the vast majority of coups being undertaken by the armed forces. Second, most studies have either relied solely on successful coups or have aggregated failed and successful attempts as one category. In the former case, the data only allows us to draw conclusions regarding when a successful coup will occur. In the case of the latter, we can make inferences regarding when elites will make the decision to attempt a coup, but we cannot draw conclusions regarding which factors determine whether or not the attempt will succeed. While some factors may explain when a coup is more likely to be attempted, those factors may be inadequate in explaining whether or not the attempt will succeed. I argue that while socio-economic, political, and military factors can impact the decision to intervene, success will largely be determined by factors related to the military. In order to properly assess both aspects of coup activity, the theory is tested with a selection model incorporating global coup data from 1960-2007. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
37 |
| Word count: |
10584 |
| Text sample: |
| Explaining the Occurrence and Outcome of Coups d’Etat Jonathan Powell University of Kentucky Dept. of Political Science 1615 Patterson Office Tower Lexington KY 40506-0027 jonathan.powell@uky.edu ABSTRACT This paper aims to further our understanding of the coup d’etat by extending previous research in two respects. First many previous studies offer theory which is relevant to and rely on data which includes only successful coup attempts. I present theoretical arguments for why coup studies should incorporate failed efforts. Second in addition |
| 0 5 10 15 Soldier Quality Predicted Probability 95% Confidence Interval 35 1 Figure 3: Impact of Military Personnel on Coup Outcomes Probability of Success .6 .4 .8 0 2 4 6 8 Military Personnel Predicted Probability 95% Confidence Interval 36 |
Similar Titles:
Political Economy and 'Quality of Life' in the early Twenty-First Century: Economic versus Political Factors
How the Interactions between Political and Administrative Institutions Impact Policy Outcomes:_x000d_A Study of Impact Fee Adoption by Local Governments Using a Bayesian Frailty Model
|
|