Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: The Law and Society Association URL: http://www.lawandsociety.org
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p304207_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Ashe, Marie. "Religious Pluralism, Multiculturalism, and Possibilities of Justice: Sharian Tribunals and Sex Equality" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Grand Hyatt, Denver, Colorado, May 25, 2009 <Not Available>. 2010-01-22 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p304207_index.html>

Ashe, M. , 2009-05-25 "Religious Pluralism, Multiculturalism, and Possibilities of Justice: Sharian Tribunals and Sex Equality" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the The Law and Society Association, Grand Hyatt, Denver, Colorado <Not Available>. 2010-01-22 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p304207_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: During the last several years, initiatives urging recognition and enforcement of the decisions of religious tribunals have come to the forefront in Western democracies. Proposals for the establishment and enforcement of decrees of “Sharian tribunals” have evoked particular controversy in Canada, the United Kingdom, and Western Europe, and increased consciousness of these global developments has recently become evident in the US. Critics of such proposals have argued that departures from the principle of “one law for all” will greatly undermine sex and gender equality. Multiculturalists have expressed receptivity to such proposals, arguing for some accommodation of religious tribunals. This paper will explore assumptions underlying both the legal-liberalist opposition to and the multiculturalist defense of “multicultural jurisdictions.” Critiquing both approaches as lacking historical, sociological, anthropological and economic groundedness, it will offer a deeply pragmatic alternative to both legal-liberalism and multiculturalism and it will urge the rejection of proposals for establishment of religious courts.

Liberty, Equality, and Justice: Democratic Values and Physical Integrity in Criminal Justice

No Power, No Justice? Justice at the Nuremberg and Hague Versus Justice at the Russell Tribunal and the World Tribunal on Iraq

Justice and Equality for All: A Black Feminist Account of the Equal Protection Clause