|
|
|
|
Globalization and the Social Power Politics of International Economic Networks |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
PTAs (Preferential Trade Agreements) are spreading rapidly - hundreds have already been notified to the WTO and more are being created. Are these agreements bad news, not just for global prosperity, but also for global political equality? We do not adopt the standard economic refrain that a rise in absolute global economic prosperity offsets the importance of how those gains are distributed (Wolf 2004). Rather, we accept that the world economy is characterized by substantial distributional inequalities between states, generating material power politics and shaping development. But the apparently increasing gap between the poor and the rich is not the whole story, and international institutions are not uniformly making the problem worse, as some have argued, or better, as others think. Preferential trade arrangements like NAFTA more and more govern economic exchange, shaping material power relations derived from sums of money or financial transactions – although there is some debate whether these organizations have an appreciable effect on material wealth and power or not (Frankel 1998); yet the same PTAs also create and sustain social power politics created by group dynamics. Like other organizations (Ingram, Robinson, and Busch 2005; Hafner-Burton and Montgomery 2006; Dorussen and Ward 2008), these institutions form social network structures, creating ties between states. The distribution of these ties endows certain states with more social capital than others, creating social power relationships that significantly affect international politics, shaping issues like whether or not states go to war or use economic sanctions (Hafner-Burton and Montgomery 2005, 2008). While states’ material power is determined by the relative size of their material capital, social power is determined by the relative social capital created by and accessed through ties with other states in the international system such as ties through mutual membership in PTAs. In this paper, we demonstrate that while inequality in material power has increased over time,inequality in social capital among states due to PTAs has decreased quite substantially. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
state (183), social (175), power (157), network (115), intern (97), materi (77), relat (70), inequ (67), capit (61), tie (59), polit (58), measur (55), ptas (49), system (49), trade (47), group (46), structur (41), ptacentdegre (41), creat (37), distribut (36), membership (35), |
Author's Keywords:
|
preferential trade agreements, social network analysis, globalization, inequality |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE" URL: http://www.isanet.org
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Hafner-Burton, Emilie. and Montgomery, Alexander. "Globalization and the Social Power Politics of International Economic Networks" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE", New York Marriott Marquis, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA, Feb 15, 2009 <Not Available>. 2009-11-04 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p310836_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Hafner-Burton, E. and Montgomery, A. , 2009-02-15 "Globalization and the Social Power Politics of International Economic Networks" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ISA's 50th ANNUAL CONVENTION "EXPLORING THE PAST, ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE", New York Marriott Marquis, NEW YORK CITY, NY, USA Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-11-04 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p310836_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: PTAs (Preferential Trade Agreements) are spreading rapidly - hundreds have already been notified to the WTO and more are being created. Are these agreements bad news, not just for global prosperity, but also for global political equality? We do not adopt the standard economic refrain that a rise in absolute global economic prosperity offsets the importance of how those gains are distributed (Wolf 2004). Rather, we accept that the world economy is characterized by substantial distributional inequalities between states, generating material power politics and shaping development. But the apparently increasing gap between the poor and the rich is not the whole story, and international institutions are not uniformly making the problem worse, as some have argued, or better, as others think. Preferential trade arrangements like NAFTA more and more govern economic exchange, shaping material power relations derived from sums of money or financial transactions – although there is some debate whether these organizations have an appreciable effect on material wealth and power or not (Frankel 1998); yet the same PTAs also create and sustain social power politics created by group dynamics. Like other organizations (Ingram, Robinson, and Busch 2005; Hafner-Burton and Montgomery 2006; Dorussen and Ward 2008), these institutions form social network structures, creating ties between states. The distribution of these ties endows certain states with more social capital than others, creating social power relationships that significantly affect international politics, shaping issues like whether or not states go to war or use economic sanctions (Hafner-Burton and Montgomery 2005, 2008). While states’ material power is determined by the relative size of their material capital, social power is determined by the relative social capital created by and accessed through ties with other states in the international system such as ties through mutual membership in PTAs. In this paper, we demonstrate that while inequality in material power has increased over time,inequality in social capital among states due to PTAs has decreased quite substantially. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
application/pdf |
| Page count: |
38 |
| Word count: |
9807 |
| Text sample: |
| Globalization and the Social Power Politics of International Economic Networks Emilie M. Hafner-Burton Assistant Professor Woodrow Wilson School for Public and International Affairs and Department of Politics Princeton University ehafner@princeton.edu and Alexander H. Montgomery Assistant Professor Department of Political Science Reed College ahm@reed.edu Forthcoming in Networked Politics: Agency Power and Governance ed. Miles Kahler Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press 2009. Despite unprecedented economic growth in recent years the rich have become richer and the poor even poorer; economic globalization |
| Concepts for Comparative Analysis." Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4):387-415. 36 Waltz Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. 1st ed. New York NY: McGraw-Hill. Wasserman Stanley and Katherine Faust. 1997. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Wendt Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. Wolf Martin. 2004. Why Globalization Works. New Haven: Yale University Press. 37 |
Similar Titles:
Power Relations between the European Union and the African, Caribbean, and Pacific Group of States in the Areas of Aid, Trade, and Politics
The New Power Politics of International Organizations: Social Structural Inequality in the International System
|
|