Author's Keywords: U.S. Nuclear Policy, Regional Power, Nuclear Potential, and Regional Security	Convention Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p360796_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Lee, Sunny. "U.S. Policy to Asia for Regional Powers in New Science and Technology: China, Russia, Japan and Korea with Nuclear Potential" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009 <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p360796_index.html>

Lee, S. , 2009-04-02 "U.S. Policy to Asia for Regional Powers in New Science and Technology: China, Russia, Japan and Korea with Nuclear Potential" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2009-11-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p360796_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In contemporary politics, power is a function of both military and economic capacities, which come from investments in science and technology. Furthermore, nuclear power explored by the advanced science and technology is the maximum condition of national achievement that many countries take advantage of to dominate international society as a recognized powerful country. When North Korea announced its nuclear program, U.S. had to reset its fundamental policy toward Asia just as Russia succeeded in its nuclear testing in 1949. Since World Wars I and II, the U.S. has confirmed its superpower position in international society from the Cold War up to present. However, Russia, China, Japan and Korea have recently challenged the U.S. position with speedy advances in science and technology. Despite international attempts to halt the North Korean nuclear program, North Korea conducted nuclear tests in 2006. As well, Japan loudly turns on the volume that it will develop nuclear program by itself, if North Korea is ratified as a nuclear country. If Japan and Korea in addition to Russia and China officially become nuclear countries, this will cause fatal policy transformation of U.S. These countries have already developed science and technology in such levels to upgrade their national potential. Furthermore, these four major powers would be willingly exposed to political ambition toward world power based on economic prosperity. In this paper, I discuss how the U.S. must rebuild its policy for regional powers with nuclear potential in Asia. Different from long-term alliance in Europe, these four major countries in Asia always stimulate U.S. position and challenge its overall policy. My paper investigates the proper solution to deal with the balance of power between the U.S. and regional powers in Asia. China, Russia, Japan and Korea are all competitive countries with the capacity to have nuclear weapons technology.

Is a pluralistic security community developing Northeast Asia? A case study on peaceful behavioral change between China, South Korea and Japan: From 1990 to 2005.

Inter-regional Asian Emigration and the Potential for International Cooperation in East Asia: A Comparative Examination of State Integration Policies in Korea and Japan