|
|
|
|
Economic Contexts and Americans’ Attitudes toward Income Inequality |
|
| Abstract | Word Stems | Keywords | Association | Citation | Get this Document | Similar Titles |
|
STOP! You can now view the document associated with this citation by clicking on the "View Document as HTML" link below. |
|
Click here to view the document
|
Abstract:
|
In this paper we propose to examine how individuals’ views toward the distribution of incomes in the United States are shaped by patterns of “objective” income inequality in their state and local contexts. When individuals reside in states or localities with high levels of income inequality, does this shape (1) how they perceive the income distribution in the United States, (2) the degree to which they perceive that income inequality is a problem, (3) their support for egalitarian values, and (4) their support for or opposition to possible policy options for addressing income inequality? To study these questions, we merge data on state and county income inequality (Guetzkow, Western, and Rosenfeld, 2007) with survey data from the 2002 and 2004 ANES surveys. We hypothesize that high levels of state and/or county income inequality will be related to individuals’ perceptions of income inequality and will facilitate the development of individuals’ egalitarian attitudes. Moreover, we speculate that income inequality activates the political meaning of income, so the relationship between income and our dependent variables will be contingent on the level of income inequality in their state and county contests. |
Most Common Document Word Stems:
inequ (255), incom (255), state (145), individu (99), percept (87), polit (59), chang (54), rise (54), level (53), year (48), effect (45), variabl (43), coeffici (41), 20 (41), perceiv (39), knowledg (37), past (36), 2008 (35), 1 (34), like (34), increas (33), |
|
 | Convention | | Need a solution for abstract management? All Academic can help! Contact us today to find out how our system can help your annual meeting. |  | Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. |  | Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! |  | Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! |  | Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. |  | Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! |  | Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! | | Click here for more information. |
|
|
Association:
Name: Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
|
Citation:
|
MLA Citation:
| Garand, James. and Xu, Ping. "Economic Contexts and Americans’ Attitudes toward Income Inequality" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009 <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p360958_index.html> |
APA Citation:
| Garand, J. C. and Xu, P. , 2009-04-02 "Economic Contexts and Americans’ Attitudes toward Income Inequality" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <PDF>. 2009-11-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p360958_index.html |
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: In this paper we propose to examine how individuals’ views toward the distribution of incomes in the United States are shaped by patterns of “objective” income inequality in their state and local contexts. When individuals reside in states or localities with high levels of income inequality, does this shape (1) how they perceive the income distribution in the United States, (2) the degree to which they perceive that income inequality is a problem, (3) their support for egalitarian values, and (4) their support for or opposition to possible policy options for addressing income inequality? To study these questions, we merge data on state and county income inequality (Guetzkow, Western, and Rosenfeld, 2007) with survey data from the 2002 and 2004 ANES surveys. We hypothesize that high levels of state and/or county income inequality will be related to individuals’ perceptions of income inequality and will facilitate the development of individuals’ egalitarian attitudes. Moreover, we speculate that income inequality activates the political meaning of income, so the relationship between income and our dependent variables will be contingent on the level of income inequality in their state and county contests. |
Get this Document:
Find this citation or document at one or all of these locations below. The links below may have the citation or the entire document for free or you may purchase access to the document. Clicking on these links will change the site you're on and empty your shopping cart.
| Document Type: |
PDF |
| Page count: |
28 |
| Word count: |
7520 |
| Text sample: |
| ECONOMIC CONTEXT AND AMERICANS’ PERCEPTIONS OF INCOME INEQUALITY Ping Xu Doctoral Candidate Department of Political Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana 70803-5433 Phone: (225) 578-2442 Email: pxu5@lsu.edu James C. Garand Emogine Pliner Distinguished Professor R. Downs Poindexter Professor Department of Political Science Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana 70803-5433 Phone: (225) 578-2548 Email: pogara@lsu.edu An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Chicago Illinois April 2-5 2009. |
| Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective.” American Sociological Review 71: 450-73). Piketty Thomas and Emmanuel Saez. 2003. ”Income Inequality in the United States: 1911-1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVII:1-39. 24 Primo David M. Matthew L. Jacobsmeier and Jeffrey Milyo. 2007. “Estimating the Impact of State Policies with Mixed-Level Data.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7: 446-59). Uslaner Eric M. and Mitchell Brown. 2005. “Inequality Trust and Civic Engagement.” American Politics Research. 33: 868-94. Zaller |
Similar Titles:
How Media Bias Affects Attitude Change: Studying Individual-Level Effects of Political Commentary on Changing Party Evaluations during the UK Election Campaign in 2005
Beyond the Gini: The Effects of Overall Inequality, Changes in Income Shares and Political Responsiveness on Economic Growth
|
|