Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p362323_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Weiksner, G. Michael. and Mo, Cecilia. "Predicting biased behavior with implicit attitudes: results from an online voting experiment" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009 <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p362323_index.html>

Weiksner, G. and Mo, C. H. , 2009-04-02 "Predicting biased behavior with implicit attitudes: results from an online voting experiment" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p362323_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: Although explicit racism has nearly vanished, and explicit sexism has reduced, many scholars worry that voters may still exhibit implicit sexist or racist voting behaviors. In other words, voters decide "as if" they were sexist or racist even though they may genuinely believe themselves to be unbiased. Yet, scholars differ on how to measure these implicit attitudes and behaviors. In September 2008, we conducted an online experiment to examine the relationship between (1) sexist voting decisions and (2) prominent measures of implicit like the Implicit Attitude Test (IAT), Affect Misattribution Procedure (AMP) and symbolic sexism survey questions. This paper makes three key contributions. First, we propose a precise definition of biased behavior and apply this definition to sexist voting decisions. Second, we test the predictive validity of prominent measures of implicit sexist attitudes. Third, we test two priming effects: whether measuring implicit attitude reduces sexist voting or not and conversely, whether measuring sexist voting reduces makes any difference. Implications for research design and analysis of implicit attitudes and behaviors are discussed, including ANES's decision to include the AMP in its 2008 study.

Do Inmate Responses to Drug Treatment Predict Recidivism? Results from a Randomized Experiment

Implicit Bias, Implicit Closeness, and Explicit Support for Blacks. Representative Survey and Online-Reaction Time Study

Political Norms and the Private Act of Voting: Results from a Field Experiment