Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364303_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

Peterson, David. and Nakajo, Miwa. "Trust in government(s): How citizens form independent trust assessments of multiple levels of government." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364303_index.html>

Peterson, D. A. and Nakajo, M. "Trust in government(s): How citizens form independent trust assessments of multiple levels of government." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL <Not Available>. 2009-11-10 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364303_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Abstract: Citizens’ trust in government depends partially on the person’s general attitude about government and partially on what government they are evaluating. Thus, there is both shared and unique variance in citizens’ assessments of federal, state, and local governments. In this paper we argue that the uniqueness of the citizens’ assessments across the levels of government depends on both the individual’s level of social connectedness and the community’s level of civic engagement. We use the Social Capital Benchmark Survey and the Hierarchical Multivariate model estimated via MCMC to show test how citizens make distinctions between the levels of government.

The States and Trust in Government: Exploring the Causes of the Divergent Levels of Trust in Government Between the States

The States and Trust in Government: Exploring the Causes of the Divergent Levels of Trust in Government Between the States