Convention Convention is an application service for managing large or small academic conferences, annual meetings, and other types of events! Submission - Custom fields, multiple submission types, tracks, audio visual, multiple upload formats, automatic conversion to pdf. Review - Peer Review, Bulk reviewer assignment, bulk emails, ranking, z-score statistics, and multiple worksheets! Reports - Many standard and custom reports generated while you wait. Print programs with participant indexes, event grids, and more! Scheduling - Flexible and convenient grid scheduling within rooms and buildings. Conflict checking and advanced filtering. Communication - Bulk email tools to help your administrators send reminders and responses. Use form letters, a message center, and much more! Management - Search tools, duplicate people management, editing tools, submission transfers, many tools to manage a variety of conference management headaches! Click here for more information.
Association: Name: Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference URL: http://www.indiana.edu/~mpsa/
Citation: URL: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364467_index.html Direct Link: HTML Code:

de Vries, Helma. and Hooker, Veronica. "The Politics of Genocide: Comparing International Media Coverage of the Sudanese Conflict in Security Council Permanent Member States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Apr 02, 2009 <Not Available>. 2009-05-22 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364467_index.html>

de Vries, H. G. and Hooker, V. , 2009-04-02 "The Politics of Genocide: Comparing International Media Coverage of the Sudanese Conflict in Security Council Permanent Member States" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL Online <APPLICATION/PDF>. 2009-05-22 from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p364467_index.html

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript Review Method: Peer Reviewed Abstract: How has media coverage of the Sudanese conflict varied cross-nationally in the permanent member states of the U.N. Security Council? What influences when the media begins to identify the conflict as genocide? Factors that may be instrumental in provoking such dynamics in media coverage include the onset and escalations of violence; changing standpoints by influential officials like the U.N. Secretary General or U.S. Secretary of State; the divergent standpoints of permanent member states in the U.N. Security Council tied to differing national interests such as oil needs, foreign policy priorities, proximity to the region, or colonial ties; the efforts by some states to control and at times to threaten the media; and the pressures brought on by the international community. In this paper, content analysis is used to examine media coverage of the Sudanese conflict comparatively, focusing on the coverage since 2003, in the largest news wires in each of the five permanent member states of the U.N. Security Council. Elite interviews of several journalists covering Sudan are also discussed, as we consider the politics of covering the Sudanese conflict as genocide, in states that are powerful decision-makers concerning interventions.

Bridging the Gap: A Return to the Historical Partnership between Academe and United States Government on Questions of Peace and Conflict Communication in International Security

Media and International Relations: European Press Coverage of the 2004 U.S. Election

The Role of Media in International Conflicts: A Long-Term Analysis of Israel’s Media Image in International TV News

Genocide in the News: Media Attention and Media Framing of the Darfur Conflict