Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The following analysis examines how within-conference variation affects long-term outcomes, specifically reoffending. In particular, I focus on the emotional, micro-dynamics of interaction, as outlined in Collins’ (2004) Microsociological theory of Interaction Ritual Chains. Using multivariate analysis from a large dataset of observed restorative justice conference as well as in depth discourse analysis of specific interactions, I argue that rhythmic entrainment and conversational balance lead to high-solidarity conference, which may influence offending rates post conference. The results speak both to the burgeoning field of the criminology of emotions, as well as theory and research in restorative justice.

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Universities, corporations, and nonprofit organizations continue to use technology to teach and share information. This study focused specifically on how trainers and trainees interact in the mediated learning environment of a Web conference. Relying on learning theoretical perspectives and the role of interactivity, this 2X2 design tested the effect of two types of interactivity: trainer-controlled and trainee-controlled. We examined outcomes relevant to the trainee—i.e. learning and satisfaction, and relevant to the trainer—i.e. trainer credibility. The findings indicate that the outcome benefiting most from high levels of interactivity is credibility. Furthermore, the goodwill dimension of credibility is affected by high levels of both types of interactivity with trainer-controlled interactivity accounting for 22% of the variance in goodwill and trainee-controlled interactivity accounting for 6%. Implications for e-learning and e-presenting are also discussed.

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: Restorative Justice (RJ) is often evaluated in terms of outcomes, most often changes in criminal behavior. There has been little focus on the practice of RJ. "Does RJ 'work'?" is often too simplistic. When does RJ work and under what conditions is more informative. In a similar vein, who conducts RJ is often overlooked. One study has examined whether police or civilian RJ conference facilitators produce different outcomes. The present study examines the role of the conference facilitator in police-led RJ conferences. Specific focus will be on procedural justice and legitimacy. We will examine whether Police RJ facilitators bring a set of skills to bring about these outcomes or whether these skills are learned through practice and skill-maintenance.

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The following analysis looks at both restorative justice conferencing and courtroom interactions from a micro-sociological perspective, focusing on the ritual components needed to create a successful outcome, namely group solidarity and a shared morality. It is a test of Interaction Ritual Theory (Collins 2004) that models for successful interaction ritual in four randomized controlled trials of restorative justice. I examine the underlying structure of a conference and the immediate outcomes for participants. The results complicate the picture of restorative justice and interaction ritual, with clear and strong differences in ritual outcomes at conferences compared to court. Both conferences and court can effectively produce group solidarity given the necessary ingredients, but the conferences have more success. It also challenges common assumptions about the role of shame in these events.

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: The following analysis examines how the process and dynamics of a restorative justice conference influences both immediate and long term outcomes. It is a test of Interaction Ritual Theory (Collins 2004) that uses multivariate analysis to model for successful interaction ritual in four randomized controlled trials of restorative justice. The immediate outcomes of a conference are feelings of group solidarity, while the long term effects may be reduced offending. The results complicate the picture of restorative justice and interaction ritual, with clear and strong differences in outcomes at conferences compared to court. It also challenges common assumptions about the role of shame in these events.