Showing 1 through 3 of 3 records. | | Pages: 30 pages | || | Words: 9364 words | || | |
| 1. Fahmy, Shahira. and Johnson, Tom. "On second thought: A longitudinal analysis of how embeds assess influences & performance in reporting the Iraq War" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, The Renaissance, Washington, DC, Aug 08, 2007 Online <PDF>. 2009-11-29 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p188484_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This study aimed to determine how well embedded reporters perceived they covered the Iraq War and whether those attitudes have changed over time. While findings suggested embeds continue to judge their overall performance as positively in 2005/06 as 2004, respondents largely recognized problems with the embedding process. Further, data analysis suggested that individual level factors, extramedia factors and ideological factors were perceived as more influential on reporting the Iraq War after President Bush declared victory in May 2003 than before that declaration. |
|
| | Pages: 27 pages | || | Words: 6614 words | || | |
| 2. Finney, Mark. "Good Embed: How the U.S. Military Improved Favorability of Coverage Through Embedding Journalists" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Sheraton New York, New York City, NY, Online <PDF>. 2009-11-29 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p11683_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: In Good Embed, the author analyzes issues of journalistic objectivity and the journalist/military relationship with regards to the 2003 war in Iraq. This is done through a content analysis of Washington Post articles written during the war, comparing the levels of favorability between embedded and non-embedded journalists on several key issues. The author seeks, and finds, a relationship between a journalist’s being embedded and favorability in coverage of the war. |
|
| | Pages: 32 pages | || | Words: 9532 words | || | |
| 3. Johnson, Tom. and Fahmy, Shahira. "When ‘Good’ Conflicts Go Bad: Testing a Hierarchy-of-Influences Model on Embeds’ Attitudes Toward Censorship in the Iraq War" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, The Renaissance, Washington, DC, Aug 08, 2007 Online <PDF>. 2009-11-29 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p202759_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Abstract: This study, based on surveys of embedded journalists, examines whether embeds' opinions towards press freedom have changed over time and whether they believe censorship has increased as criticism of the Iraq War have increased and public support has declined. It also tests the hierarchy-of influences model by examining the degree to which individual, journalism routines, extramedia and ideological factors significantly predict attitudes towards press freedom and perceptions of censorship after controlling for demographics and political ideology variables. |
|
|
|
