Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Abstract
Conflict Resolution Evaluation – Constructing a Disputant
Self-evaluation Guide for International Negotiation Based on a
theoretical framework developed by David Bloomfield (1997, 1998) and an
application of it by Margaret Keiley-Listermann (2003), this paper
seeks to construct a tool of evaluation for the field of conflict
resolution. The field of peace studies has recently focused upon the
power of conflict transformation while lamenting the availability of
practitioners to receive feedback during the peace processes (INCORE
2002). If the goal of conflict resolution is the absence of conflict,
then it is necessary for the disputing parties to be fully engaged in
and interactive with the process. It follows that it is their
evaluation of the process upon which the ultimate success of the
resolution can be judged. By empowering the disputants to articulate
their positions and interests by framing the issues in a clear, unified
rhetoric of negotiation, the overt and subtle nuances of the political
conflict become exposed. Furthermore, by integrating the disputant
based evaluations into the conflict resolution process, the disputants
invest themselves in the process, thereby legitimizing the peace
attempt and building trust with the mediator/arbitrator.

Publication Type: Extended Abstract
Abstract: Paper describes the process of using external evaluators in the classroom to evaluate oral communication competencies in a program mandated by the State of Virginia. External evaluators also evaluated the program of assessment according to state standards. Data from two different semesters will be included in the paper.

Publication Type: Traditional Presentation
Abstract: This presentation highlights a participatory approach to developing internally sustainable evaluation programs for EE organizations. This approach not only provides efficient, long-term program assessment, but also enhances staff commitment to their organization, to each other, and to adaptive management.

Publication Type: Abstract
Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this project is the development and utilization of a new admission application scoring tool to evaluate applicants applying to the University of Maryland, School of Pharmacy. This tool allows the admissions committee to compare candidates based on a group of factors as opposed to single factors such as PCAT or GPA. Methods: The admissions committee identified five target areas that are of major importance when considering a pharmacy school applicant for interview. These five target areas included in the tool are: letters of recommendation, academic performance, PCAT score, work experience, and evidence of leadership. A four point scale was created for each area creating the highest potential score of 20, with 1 as the lowest rating, and 4 as the highest rating. Each candidate is evaluated according to their application packet and the information is utilized in the admissions review process. After the interview process, scores are included based on interview results. Total scores are utilized in the admissions decision process. For those admitted and entering the school, we will compare their tool scores to measures such as GPA to evaluate any relationship between scoring and academic performance. Conclusions: At the end of this admissions cycle, we would have utilized this screening tool for two years and will continue to refine our admissions process. For the coming years, we will utilize the data to compare scores of accepted candidates and performance in the first year of the curriculum.

Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: In August 2008 Juarez and Associates was given the task of evaluating the impact of a multi-year national book program intended to support the development of school libraries in Egypt. Identifying the qualitative impact of this program required the development of new monitoring tools. These tools needed to be easy to use, sensitive to emerging trends, and reliable across diverse contexts. This presentation highlights three sets of data collection tools that were used in this program evaluation: imported interview materials that were locally-adapted, locally-developed observation materials, and photography. The tools and the processes used to develop these tools should be of interest to others who are engaged in program monitoring and evaluation.