Showing 1 through 5 of 42 records. | | Pages: 22 pages | || | Words: 6422 words | || | |
| 1. Corey, Elizabeth. "Voegelin and Oakeshott on Hobbes: Gnostic but not Rationalist?" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston Marriott Copley Place, Sheraton Boston & Hynes Convention Center, Boston, Massachusetts, Aug 28, 2002 <Not Available>. 2009-12-05 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p66657_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Eric Voegelin and Michael Oakeshott are famous for their similar critiques of modernity: gnosticism and rationalism, respectively. Given the striking similarities of these two constructs one would expect Voegelin and Oakeshott to approach Hobbes from a similar perspective. Yet they do not. This paper investigates why their approaches are so different; namely, why Voegelin considers Hobbes a gnostic while for Oakeshott Hobbes is no rationalist. |
|
| | Pages: 12 pages | || | Words: 5772 words | || | |
| 2. Stradaioli, Nicoletta. "Philosophical Anthropology: Voegelin's Debt to Max Scheler" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-12-05 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42623_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Even though Scheler was twenty-seven years older than Voegelin both of them had witnessed a radical cultural, social and political change in the intellectual context that had crossed German intellectual life, in particular, and European in general after the First World War. The precarious situation of human beings reawaken the search for a foundation of spiritual life in reality and led several intellectuals to try to reorganize the knowledge about human existence, after the incredible flourishing of positivistic science that had marked the late 19th and early 20th centuries. |
|
| | Pages: 7 pages | || | Words: 3524 words | || | |
| 3. Thompson-Uberuaga, William. "Voegelin and Huizinga on Play and Political Theory" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott Wardman Park, Omni Shoreham, Washington Hilton, Washington, DC, Sep 01, 2005 <Not Available>. 2009-12-05 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p42618_index.html>Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: This paper queries how and to what extent Voegelin's thought has been influenced by Huizinga's HOMO LUDENS, as well as how Huizinga's work might help clarify certain features of Voegelin's work, especially hisORDER AND HISTORY. |
|
| 4. Petropulos, William. "Eric Voegelin and the Stefan George Circle" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, <Not Available>. 2009-12-05 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p153560_index.html>Publication Type: Proceeding |
|
| 5. Srigley, Ron. "A Comparative Analysis of Voegelin's Notion of Tragedy and Sophocles' Antigone" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, <Not Available>. 2009-12-05 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p153568_index.html>Publication Type: Proceeding |
|
|
|
