Convention    Search    Archive
Welcome: Guest
  
  
Search Form
 
Search: 
Search By: SubjectAbstractAuthorTitleFull-Text

 

Search Results
Showing 1 through 1 of 1 records.
 Pages: 20 pages || Words: 6271 words || 
Info
1. Holtzman, Richard. "Assessing Metacognitive Inequalities in Large Classes through Active Learning: A Simple Exercise for Teaching and Learning in Political Science" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL, Sep 02, 2004 <Not Available>. 2009-11-22 <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p59498_index.html>
Publication Type: Conference Paper/Unpublished Manuscript
Review Method: Peer Reviewed
Abstract: Teaching strategies that seek to facilitate active learning among undergraduates are increasingly being employed in the political science classroom. However, there exists a widespread assumption that it is difficult, if not impossible, to successfully utilize active learning techniques in large classes. This assumption is particularly detrimental to student learning in introductory political science courses considering that they are the first (and sometimes only) experience that undergraduates have with the discipline. This paper maintains that active learning is possible in large classes. To support this claim, I offer an teaching and learning exercise based on continuous, classroom assessment that employs active learning strategies. In my experience, I have found this exercise to be effective, efficient, practical, and simple. Data collected from my students indicates that it is also able to address many of the problems that are commonly associated with large classes by (a) allowing for frequent assessments of student understanding and progress, (b) addressing inequalities among students that result from differences in metacognitive skills, (c) facilitating student self-assessment and course feedback, (d) aiding in retention and recall, (e) encouraging class attendance and generating participation in a non-coercive learning atmosphere, and (f) challenging students to think critically and actively engage with course materials.

©2009 All Academic, Inc.